Wednesday, September 25, 2019

No church on Sunday, road closed...


This Sunday one of the town churches I serve is having to keep its doors closed because very few of the congregation can get to church because of road closures for an event. And it is not that people cannot get from one side of the town to another, they are not able to get to the church itself. This has made me quite angry, as once again it has felt like we are the only worship community in the town that does not matter. None of the other churches who are effected by the closures are being restricted to the extent we are—the only way to get to the church is by walking or riding a bike, we are told, we cannot marshal a small section of road to let you get to and from the church in cars. Therefore, when you have an elderly, gathered congregation and no Sunday public transport system that adequately serves the people or the location in the town where the church is, the only option is to keep the doors closed.

As I have been grumbling away about this, however, climate change has again made the headlines with protests and some large town centres being closed to cars for a day. Within the United Reformed Church we have decisions being taken over investments so that we no longer invest in fossil fuel. There is a passion for eco-churches and the want to be carbon neutral. Therefore, even though the event that has closed the road outside the church has nothing to do with this issue, the fact the town is being encouraged not to use their cars for a day to get around we should be celebrating and encouraging.

On one hand, I want to. I want to support all these ventures to decrease the carbon output into the atmosphere. But on the other hand, I feel backed into a corner—I have five churches, all gathered congregations, all of whom without people being able to drive to them on a Sunday would either be empty or have no one to lead their worship. I have five churches, all of who contain folk who come to that church because their nearest church was closed. I have five churches, which in the long term are probably not sustainable with the size on congregation and membership, yet to amalgamate is not really an option because of distances and transport, not to mention the impact on our carbon footprint. If the doors were closed on some of the more rural churches in the area I serve, then it would not be the start of a new exciting venture, it would be the desertion of small, faithful groups of Christians.
There is no arguing that the figures show us that the United Reformed Church has more church buildings than it can feasibly sustain with its membership levels and ministerial resources. Yet, if we are passionate about the climate, how do we reduce that number of churches without asking people to travel further to church on Sunday (or at another time in the week)? And then if we are about discipleship and building up God’s people, how do we say to our folk who might be limited in their mobility but are no less faithful, that they cannot come to worship together if that means they have to come by car?

As I travel around my five churches and observe the different issues in those five communities, I wrestle to find a potential answer. In four years, I have ruled out a number of solutions and I am yet to find an idea that might be worth testing! I have got to the point that I would like to just bury my head in the sand and not worry about it, but that is not a plan. We cannot do nothing. What we will need to do is something radical and that is scary, especially when it means turning everything on its head. Then again, that is what God does best!

For now, however, when cars are not an option, there is ‘No church on Sunday’!

Sunday, August 4, 2019

Storehouses and treasure ...

This Sunday's lectionary includes the parable of the rich fool and was the passage of scripture I felt I needed to preach on. As my sermon unfolded onto the page I had the congregation I will lead in worship in mind, but on reflection this is a sermon that I could preach in probably of the United Reformed Churches I serve. It is probably one I would feel able to preach even in a church I do not know pastorally.

And so, I share today's sermon here. It might not be the finest example of the craft of preaching, but in an age when material wealth is of great importance and there are many issues, in the church and elsewhere, relating to storehouses, there is a challenge here for us all.

Luke 12.13-21 (NRSV)
Someone in the crowd said to him, ‘Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with me.’ But he said to him, ‘Friend, who set me to be a judge or arbitrator over you?’ And he said to them, ‘Take care! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; for one’s life does not consist in the abundance of possessions.’ Then he told them a parable: ‘The land of a rich man produced abundantly. And he thought to himself, “What should I do, for I have no place to store my crops?” Then he said, “I will do this: I will pull down my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my goods. And I will say to my soul, Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry.” But God said to him, “You fool! This very night your life is being demanded of you. And the things you have prepared, whose will they be?” So it is with those who store up treasures for themselves but are not rich towards God.’



On first glance, we might want to ask what all the fuss is about with respects to this parable of Jesus’. What the man in the story does seems to resonant with what most of us, I would guess, have been taught or been encouraged to do during our lives—be prudent with what we have; plan for the future and/or that rainy day. Admittedly, depending on how things have turned out for each of us in our lives, whether we have been lucky to always have a job with an adequate wage, will have influenced how successful we have been at this. Yet, even if our saves have only ever been great enough for a very small piggy bank or biscuit tin, we will have aimed to put something by ‘just in case’.

This prudent mentality of the man in the story, however, gets labelled as being foolish. Why, when these were not ill-gotten gains like in the parable of the wicked tenants (Matthew 21.33-41) or the dishonest manager (Luke 16.1-9)? The man had done all the right things: he had toiled hard and the harvest had been more than fruitful. And then, as we can find other examples of within the scriptures, for example Joseph managing the years of plenty followed by the years of famine in Egypt (Genesis 41), the man looked to ensure nothing went to waste by building bigger barns. The only thing that goes wrong with the plan was that the man dies before he had a chance to do anything with the wealth he had collected. He didn’t even get the chance to have his party! So why does Jesus use such strong language and have God calling the man a fool?

When we look more closely at the story, there are two things that we should note. Firstly, the man’s barns were already full. Secondly, the only person in the picture the man paints was the man himself. Why build bigger barns when clearly the man had more than he needed already? Why, when we can probably rightly assume that this was a man who would have been an upright citizen and observer of religious law, does he not take note of those Mosaic laws about having concern for ones neighbours, particularly those who may not have the ability to provide for themselves as the man could? Well, because Jesus wanted to draw the listeners attention to the age-old problem we have in humanity: our ability to so easily become self-centred, even when initially our intentions may have not been—we were only just putting something away for a rainy-day!

The reason Jesus embarked on this story with the crowd was in response to a question that related to greed. The law of the land had been followed, inheritances had been distributed accordingly, two-thirds to the oldest son and one-third to the youngest. But the youngest believed they should have had more. Maybe so, if we believe in equal rights, but at that point in the history of the people of Israel that was not the case. And actually why was it that the younger son believed he should have been entitled to more? Could he give an answer that was about something other than his own creature comforts? Given the nature of the parable, probably not, and that is why we have this foolish man, whose actions which may have been once about being prudent had become ones centred on himself and blow the rest of the world!

This is one of Jesus’ parables that does not have a happy ending. We are left on a cliff-edge with the question of who now is going to benefit from all that the man has stored up on earth. There is no one it would seem. The grain will just rot away in those vast barns and finally the barns will fall into rack and ruin. It’s shocking, yet Jesus does use these shock tactics every so often to wake up the crowd and us. We need that prod in the ribs to look at what we are doing and how we are living out our lives as disciples.

In the gospel of Matthew, we have the story of another rich man, one who this time Jesus encounters. Like the rich fool in the parable, he was an upright man keeping the law, yet he wanted to know what else he should do to ensure that he might have eternal life. Jesus’ response was, ‘if your wish to be perfect, go, sell your possessions, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me.’ (Matthew 19.21) The way the story is told, this was just one step too far for that rich man. And although we may not be rich in wealth ourselves, even with what we do materially have, it is probably a step too far for most of us. This, however, does not mean we are doomed in our following of Christ.

The rich man’s foolishness in the parable, told by Jesus in the gospel of Luke, is not so much about what he had stored up or that he had even chosen to do that. Rather it is about the wisdom behind how he dealt with his gathering wealth. There was no plan for what that wealth could do other than sit in those barns for a rainy day that may never arrive. Which actually never did arrive for that rich man. It is not wrong to have some sort of reserve, but what is that reserve truly being kept for? Once the bills are paid, should all that is left over go into that ‘rainy day pot’ or does some of it need to be used elsewhere? Should it be handed on to a neighbour who has hit that ‘rainy day’ but has nothing to fall back on?

As both individuals and as a community, this parable is a true challenge. Not only may we have wealth that we need to wisely discern how best manage, but we may have other gifts from God in our lives and around us in the world that God would encourage us to make the most of but we know we need to do so with great wisdom. As our communion liturgy speaks of, God made us stewards of the world. This parable reminds us that we need to undertake that stewardship appropriately. We need to see the bigger picture as well as some of the finer detail. We need to try not to get centred on one thing that could draw us into a self-contained existence that loses sight of even God.

What then are in our storehouses? Why are we hold on to such things and what is that ‘rainy day’ that we fear? Is it time to let go and celebrate what God has given us and then really engage with God in how we go forward, wisely using what we have and who we are because of God’s grace towards us? After all, God’s call to us as disciples of Jesus Christ is to walk Jesus’ way and tell every corner of the world the good news. God did not call us to sit in storehouse or barns waiting for the rainy day!

Amen