Monday, September 14, 2015

When you don't think you've got the right sermon for the right congregation...

This past Sunday's lectionary could have taken me in lost of different directions, but I'm always a little surprised at where I end up by the time I've finished my sermon. And this week, once I had got to the end I thought that the sermon I had was most probably better suited for one of my other congregations than the one I was leading worship on Sunday morning, but as this is what had landed on the page, there wasn't much I could do about it. So here is the sermon I preached on and one that more than one person left saying gave them 'food for thought', even though I was sure I was preaching it to the wrong crowd...

The scipture readings we were considering were: Mark 8.27-38, James 3.1-12 and Proverbs 1.20-33

I am sure many of us have walked through town or city centres and heard the street-corner evangelists shouting at passers-by. But how many of us have ever stopped to listen to what they have to say? There was a group in Bury St Edmunds the other Saturday whom I walked passed. And as I passed by I heard one of them shouting about how they had been at the bottom of the pile, but once they were saved, life had never been better. They were shouting the sort of things that makes me feel really uncomfortable if I’m honest, and, in my opinion, gives ‘evangelism’ a bad reputation. But later on I was walking along a parallel street to where this group were positioned and I heard another one of them shouting, but this time it wasn’t their life story they were shouting about, instead they were giving passers-by the advice to watch where they were walking! It was one of those moments when I did almost stop to listen—where was this advice to the shoppers to watch out for undesirable things they could walk in on the pavement going. But my intrigue didn’t last long because in the words of the speaker the pavement seemed to becoming more and more littered, and having just walked down that street myself and having not seen any of that, I concluded that the person was heading towards some sort of ‘repent or burn’ teaching, which I just couldn’t listen to, so I hurried on.

However, despite how uncomfortable I am with what many of these street-corner evangelists shout, I do have to feel a little sorry for them. Standing there, day after day, with no one listening, has to be soul destroying after a while. But I wonder if anyone has become so discouraged they have come up with a similar repose to the one we heard from Wisdom in the book of Proverbs? In Proverbs, Wisdom has given up shouting about ‘Good News’ and instead turned to shouting the bad news that comes from no one being bothered to listen her; to heed the good advice she’s been giving them; to take interest in the great knowledge and wisdom she had been trying to share with the people. In fact what Wisdom says is callous and unforgiving. It is a fine example of an Old Testament rebuke when the people had not heeded the word of God and the only option left open to them was to fear God!
Yet, with the marrying of these verses from Proverbs with those from the letter of James and the gospel of Mark, I have to think that this week’s lectionary isn’t so much a challenge for us as a whole, but rather one for the preacher. After spending years standing in the pulpit, with the pews still half-empty and enthusiasm for doing anything remaining at a constant low, it would be very easy to get caught up in the words of Wisdom and say ‘Amen sister’. But should the preacher be making such a response? Can the fact the pews are half-empty and the general lack of enthusiasm remains, really only be blamed on the congregation and/or local community? Or should the preacher be questioning their own ability to listen; their own ability to pay attention to what Wisdom has attempted to share with them?

“Who do you say I am?” was Jesus’ question to the disciples (Mark 8.29). Here again we have another slightly confusing discourse between Jesus and the disciples. It seems to have been quite a straight forward, ‘passing the time of day’ conversation until the point where Jesus asks his question of them. The disciples had been merrily feeding back to Jesus what they had heard as they had been travelling around the villages. But then Peter, in true Peter style, replies: “Well you’re the Messiah, of course!” and then everything becomes a little awkward. Now whether Jesus’ teaching of the disciples did follow straight after this comment of Peter’s and Jesus’ response is open to debate. However, in the editing of these two stories together, the author of Mark has done something quite clever, which might just go towards explaining some of Jesus’ ‘be quiet’ reproofs. Very often in Mark, when the author reports Jesus as telling people not to tell anyone, commentators talk about the secrecy of Mark and the author not wanting Jesus’ true person to be disclosed before the end of the story. And in these verses from Mark, that is happening, but in how these two events are linked another reason for why there needs to be this secrecy opens up. In most of these situations when Jesus then tells people to ‘be quiet’, the disciples and others haven’t quite got to grips with exactly who Jesus is yet, and therefore Jesus wants them to be much wiser with their choice of words when talking about him. Give Peter his dues; he knew his scripture and the promise of a Messiah. And he was right to make the connection between the Messiah and who Jesus was. But what Peter thought the Messiah would do and what he actually did, and does, are two very different things. So Jesus was trying to get the disciples to guard their language, and make sure they truly understood who the Messiah was before they started spreading the news. How does the saying go: “a little knowledge is a dangerous thing!” So to avoid that danger, it is sometimes better to stay quiet, at least until you are better informed. But as preachers and teachers, I have to ask myself, do we always do this? It is one of those traps that can be easily fallen into when you have a little knowledge on a subject area. Before you know it you are sounding like an expert, all because you’ve verbally crafted some educated answers to questions on topics that if you’re honest you know very little about. And this is at the centre of Jesus’ rebuke of Peter and the cautionary tale from the letter of James. They are words that all preachers should heed because of the authority that standing in the pulpit gives and the weighty responsibility that goes along with this authority.

The author of the letter of James points out how our use of language can be a powerful thing and because it is so powerful it is also dangerous. In fact, in the twelve verses we heard, the author aptly demonstrated this with the dramatic use of metaphor. A vast forest can be reduced to a pile of ashes by a single, tiny flame, just as a one misused, misplaced word can destroy true meaning in an instant. It is a levelling thought for when preparing a sermon. As the one expounding Scripture, do you really understand what you are talking about? Is what you are saying really what you mean? Is your response to the texts of the day more in line with Peter’s speedy response to Jesus question “Who do you say I am?” or have you taken the time to listen to the counsel of Wisdom? The advantage of a sermon is that at least you have the time to think about the words you use to try and ensure you have the knowledge to support what you are saying. And if as preachers, we are not doing this then we need to stop and reflect on our practice, because if we are not taking the time to listen to Wisdom then we are on very shaky ground. But that is all well and good for those of us set apart to do the Sunday morning slot, but what about the rest of us? Is there something in these texts that are a challenge not just for the preacher but for all of us? Well what about when you find yourself in a conversation on a street corner and that impossible question comes from nowhere? What do you do when the little knowledge you have is not enough?

The response you are very often taught in presentation skills when those awkward questions come up is: “good question, let me give that some thought and I’ll come back to you.” However, that kind of response doesn’t work in a brief encounter on a street corner, but maybe this is where some of the other wisdom that the author of the letter of James shares with us might be helpful. If you can cast your minds back a couple of weeks when we heard from the first chapter of James, we heard the phrase: “Everyone must be quick to listen, but slow to speak…” (James 1.19b) If we take time and don’t rush to make our response, very often in what we hear the person saying, the question doesn’t come quite out of the blue and some response can be made that it true to what we know. And also if we take time to listen, it means we also have time to listen to what God is saying in these situations, which very often leads us to having just the right words to say.

How ever much Wisdom wanted to just speak a message of doom, she couldn’t end her reproof without a glimmer of hope: “But whoever listens to me will have security. They will be safe, with no reason to be afraid.” (Proverbs 1.33) Whether preacher, teacher or occupier of a pew, if we take time to listen and reflect before we speak, then God will be at hand and there will be no need to fear. And our answer to the question “Who do you say I am?” will not be without knowledge or wisdom of what the true response is and what that means.

It is amazing what happens sometimes!